 |
|
|
| [Home] [APPW 2004] [Journal papers] |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL ON THE PAPER MACHINE Alberto W. Ramos Winner of the Pine Award: Best Technical Article in Recovery and Utilities at the ABTCP-PI 2005 Congress This paper first appeared in O Papel Magazine, March 2006
ABSTRACT This paper presents a special statistical process control (SPC) chart suitable for continuous processes like the paper machine in the PPI. Certain aspects that are unique to this kind of process make conventional SPC charts inadequate and misleading, causing false alarms and search of non-existent problems. Key words: paper machine, statistical process control, 3-D control chart 1. Introduction Several attempts to introduce Statistical Process Control (SPC) in the paper industry have been unsuccessful. Various are the reasons alleged for this fact, but the main one is the non -acquaintance with certain control charts, referred to as special, destined to control continuous processes, as is the case of the paper machine. These charts are exceptions with regard to the conventional control charts, so that it is important to understand for which reasons they should be adopted and how to work them out. This paper tries to introduce the control chart called 3-D, as it monitors simultaneously three characteristics of the process. In the end, a comparative example of this one and a traditional chart is presented. 2. Conventional Control Charts The control charts, developed by Shewhart (1931), admit that a given observation of a quality characteristic X (xt) obtained from a statistically stable process (with constant average
where Shewhart adopted the criterion that given any statistics (W) calculated based on these observations, independently of its sample related probability distribution, will have as control limits:
Due to the fact that the sample related means tend to have a normal distribution, by virtue of the Central Limit Theorem, as well as because the variance of the means is lower than the process variance (or individual values), it is usual to adopt mean (x-bar) and range (R) type charts. The latter are those most frequently used in every kind of industry and the paper making one is no exception. The control limits for the mean chart are as follows:
where x-two bars is the grand mean of the k samples obtained, A2 being defined as:
where d2 is a correction factor of the bias introduced by the replacement of
This chart (x-bar) is used together with the range chart (R), which has as control limits:
where D3 and D4 are also correction factors, a function of the size of the sample (n), supplied in Annex A. Further details about these correction factors may be obtained at Montgomery (1996).
Some important comments follow:
3. A Curious Case Study On a paper machine, in the end of each roll (Jumbo roll), five specimens are taken in machine cross direction. These ones are sent to the laboratory, which determines their basis weight. The results of 25 consecutive rolls are shown in Table 1. Considering the way the data are presented and taking into account the habitual use of charts for the mean and range (x-bar and R), the natural tendency would be to call every roll a sample and consequently one would go over to calculating the mean (x-bar) and the range (R) per paper roll. As grand mean (x-two bars) and mean range (R-bar), the following values are obtained:
Applying these results to the formulas (3) and (5) and remembering that in this case n = 5, the control charts of Figure 1, shown in the following, are obtained. The control chart of the mean indicates the presence of a special cause of variation: stratification. In other words, the chart points to an apparently curious problem, which is the lack of variation in the process. When stratification appears, its cause is usually either in the way the samples have been collected or else, how they have been applied to the control limit calculation. In the particular case, the charts have been set up without analyzing which kind of variation is being pointed to on each of them.
Table 1 – Paper roll data
The range (R) chart always presents a variation called within sample, i.e. in the present situation the basis weight variation in machine cross direction, since all five specimens are thus obtained. On the other hand, the mean chart (x-bar) shows another type of variation, called between samples, i.e. the basis weight variation in machine direction. It is known by the practice in controlling this process that the machine cross direction variations are of a totally distinct nature from that of the machine direction variations. Consequently, it can be said that using the machine cross direction variation (represented here by R-bar) to establish how much the process can vary in machine direction (x-bar) is a totally mistaken practice.
Figure 1 – Control Charts for Basis Weight Means and Ranges.
4. 3-D Control Chart On a conventional chart for variables, the R-bar value determines the distance at which the control limits are from the mean line on the x-bar chart. In other words, the variation within sample determines the difference that can exist in the variation between samples, before the latter is considered as statistically significant. However, there are situations in which the variation inside the sample does not serve as a good basis for establishing the control limits of x-bar. Cases where this occurs are:
The 3-D (three-dimensional) control chart is, as a matter of fact, a combination of the mean and range charts (x-bar and R) with the charts for individual values and moving range (x-MR ), according to Ramos (2000), so that they make it possible to simultaneously control more than two types of variation. The R chart will monitor the variation within sample. Consequently:
The MR chart, for its part, will serve as a basis to establish the distance of the control limits to the mean line on the x-bar chart. Therefore:
Finally, the x-bar chart will be calculated by means of the formulas:
5. The Curious Case Revisited Since the control of variation in both machine and machine cross directions are important, the 3-D graph is a sensible option. The same data of Table 1 are re-presented in the following (Table 2). However, a new column was added, that of the moving range of values taken in pairs (the modulus of the highest minus the lowest value). Following is obtained with the results of this last table:
The remaining grand mean and mean range values remain unchanged. The control limits for the MR chart are:
The 3-D chart is supplied in Figure 2. By analyzing the control graphs, it can be remarked that the process is stable (there is no presence of special variation causes having an influence).
Table 2 – Basis Weight Values of 25 Paper Rolls
Figure 2 – 3-D Graph
6. Conclusions Although the books about traditional quality tools usually do not present this technique, it is extremely important in the pulp and paper industry (PPI), as on the paper machine. Even in leading statistical softwares this control chart is not easily found, or else it is presented by another name. An ill-selected tool may cause several problems in the quality control and improvement. Thus, using conventional mean and range (x-bar and R) control charts will lead to wrong conclusions. The 3-D control chart is a suitable solution. 7. Literature Burr, J.T. The effects of non-normality on constants for x-bar and R charts. Industrial Quality Control, Milwaukee, v.23, p.563-9, 1967. Montgomery, D.C. Introduction to statistical quality control. 3 ed. New York, Wiley, 1996 Ramos; A. W. CEP para processo contínuo e em bateladas. São Paulo, Edgard Blücher, 2000. ________. CEP para pequenos lotes. São Paulo, Edgard Blücher, 1995. Schilling, E.G.; Nelson, P.R. The effect of nonnormality on the control limits of x-bar charts. Journal of Quality Technology, Milwaukee, v.8, 1976. Shewhart, W.A. Economic control of quality of manufactured product. Milwaukee, ASQC Quality Press, 1989. Wheeler, D.J. Advanced topics in statistical process control. Knoxville, SPC, 1996. Annex A - FACTORS FOR CONTROL LIMIT CALCULATION
Source: Montgomery D. C. Introduction to statistical quality control. 3rd ed. New York, John Wiley, 1996. Alberto Ramos is an Engineer, Master and Doctor in Production Engineering, graduated from the Polytechnic School of Sao Paulo University (EPUSP). He is also professor at this same institution and at Vanzolini Foundation, where he leads the Group of Specialists in Methodology. Contact awramos@usp.br |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and standard deviation 
) can be adequately represented through the mathematical model:
is the assumed sample related error, normally and independently distributed, with
average 0 and constant standard deviation.
with R-bar in the formula (see Annex A), and R-bar is the mean range defined as:
